Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection using inductive programming" » "coding detection using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using objective programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using reactive programming" (Expand search), "doping detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "fading detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using inductively programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using in python python programming" » "using in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using in piton python programming" (Expand search), "using in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using _ python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding detection using inductive programming") OR ("using in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection using inductive programming\") OR (\"using in python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection using inductive programming ) OR ( using in python python programming ))*.