Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection in linear programming" » "doping detection in linear programming" (Expand search), "fading detection in linear programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection in linear programming" (Expand search), "coding detection and linear programming" (Expand search), "coding detection non linear programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in line programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection in linear programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection in linear programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding detection in linear programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.