Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection in generative programming" » "coding detection in declarative programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in genetic programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in objective programming" (Expand search), "doping detection in generative programming" (Expand search), "fading detection in generative programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection in generative programming" (Expand search), "coding detection on generative programming" (Expand search), "coding detection in regenerative programming" (Expand search), "coding detection and generative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding detection in generative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection in generative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection in generative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.