Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding collisions with declarative programming" » "counting collisions with declarative programming" (Expand search), "changing collisions with declarative programming" (Expand search), "bidding collusions with declarative programming" (Expand search), "coding collisions the declarative programming" (Expand search), "coding collisions in declarative programming" (Expand search), "coding collisions with degenerative programming" (Expand search), "coding collisions at declarative programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding collisions with declarative programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding collisions with declarative programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding collisions with declarative programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.