Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding coding in type1 programming" » "coding coding in typed programming" (Expand search), "coding coding in type programming" (Expand search), "coding coding in cone programming" (Expand search), "coding decoding in type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding using in type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding canine in type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding coding rna type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding coding and type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding coding _ type1 programming" (Expand search), "coding coding in types programming" (Expand search), "coding coding en type programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding coding in type1 programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding coding in type1 programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding coding in type1 programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding coding in type1 programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.