Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding allocation in robot programming" » "coding automation in robot programming" (Expand search), "computing allocation in robot programming" (Expand search), "damping allocation in robot programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation in robots programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation in goal programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation in cone programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation of robot programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation in robotic programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation in robert programming" (Expand search), "coding allocation _ robot programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding allocation in robot programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding allocation in robot programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding allocation in robot programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.