Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"codes using depth in programming" » "codes using depth and programming" (Expand search), "codes using depth _ programming" (Expand search), "codes using depth c programming" (Expand search), "code using depth in programming" (Expand search), "nodes using depth in programming" (Expand search), "des using depth in programming" (Expand search), "codes sowing depth in programming" (Expand search), "codes using dental in programming" (Expand search), "codes using depth of programming" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("codes using depth in programming") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"codes using depth in programming\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( codes using depth in programming ) OR ( api pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("codes using depth in programming") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))*.