Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coders using subsampling algorithmic functions" » "coders using upsampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coders using subsampling logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using subsampling logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coders using subsampling algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coders and subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "codes using subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "code using subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "towers using subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coders using subsampling algorithmic functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coders using subsampling algorithmic functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coders using subsampling algorithmic functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.