Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coders using sampling algorithmic functions" » "coders using sampling logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using sampling logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coders using upsampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coders using subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using saline algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using samples algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "codes using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "code using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "towers using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coders using sampling algorithmic functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coders using sampling algorithmic functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coders using sampling algorithmic functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.