Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder workers discourse at programming" » "coder worker's discourse at programming" (Expand search), "coder work discourse at programming" (Expand search), "coder workers disperse at programming" (Expand search), "coder workers discourse arts programming" (Expand search), "coder workers discourse data programming" (Expand search), "coder workers discourse and programming" (Expand search), "older workers discourse at programming" (Expand search), "over workers discourse at programming" (Expand search), "under workers discourse at programming" (Expand search), "coder workers discourses at programming" (Expand search), "coder workers discourse an programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder workers discourse at programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder workers discourse at programming ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder workers discourse at programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.