Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using upsampling algorithms in" » "coder using sampling algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using sampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using oversampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using subsampling algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using upsampling algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder using upsampling algorithms _" (Expand search), "coders using upsampling algorithms in" (Expand search), "cover using upsampling algorithms in" (Expand search), "code using upsampling algorithms in" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using upsampling algorithms in") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using upsampling algorithms in\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using upsampling algorithms in ) OR ( api pitons python python programming ))*.