Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using swine algorithm in" » "coder using stone algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using line algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using spike algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using swine algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using swine algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using swine algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using swine algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using swine algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using swine algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using single algorithm in" (Expand search)
"api pythons python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using swine algorithm in") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using swine algorithm in\") OR (\"api pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using swine algorithm in ) OR ( api pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using swine algorithm in") OR ("api pythons python python programming"))*.