Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using subsampling algorithm in" » "coder using sampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using upsampling algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using oversampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and subsampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using subsampling algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using subsampling algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using subsampling algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using subsampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using subsampling algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using subsampling algorithm in" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using subsampling algorithm in") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using subsampling algorithm in\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using subsampling algorithm in ) OR ( via python python python programming ))*.