Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using sequential logarithmic function" » "coder using exponential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithm function" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithms function" (Expand search), "coder in sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder and sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder with sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coders using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "cover using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "code using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using sequential logarithmic function\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using sequential logarithmic function ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using sequential logarithmic function") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.