Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using sequential logarithmic function" » "coder using exponential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithm function" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithms function" (Expand search), "coder in sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder and sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder with sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coders using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "cover using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "code using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"rpa python python python programming" » "rpa pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa piton python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "via python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using sequential logarithmic function") OR ("rpa python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using sequential logarithmic function\") OR (\"rpa python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using sequential logarithmic function ) OR ( rpa python python python programming ))*.