Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using sequential algorithmic functions" » "coder using sequential algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using sequencial algoritmo functions" (Expand search), "coder using sequential logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using sequential logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using sequential algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder in sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder and sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder with sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "cover using sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "code using sequential algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"api pitons python python programming" » "api pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api citons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using sequential algorithmic functions") OR ("api pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using sequential algorithmic functions\") OR (\"api pitons python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using sequential algorithmic functions ) OR ( api pitons python python programming ))*.