Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using segmented tangible programming" » "coder using segmented language programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented time programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented single programming" (Expand search), "coder using augmented tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder using segment tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder using selected tangible programming" (Expand search), "coders using segmented tangible programming" (Expand search), "cover using segmented tangible programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented tangible programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using segmented tangible programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using segmented tangible programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using segmented tangible programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using segmented tangible programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.