Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using segmented r programming" » "coder using augmented r programming" (Expand search), "coder using segment r programming" (Expand search), "coder using selected r programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented _ programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented c programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented pair programming" (Expand search), "coders using segmented r programming" (Expand search), "cover using segmented r programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented r programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented or programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented i programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented mri programming" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using segmented r programming\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using segmented r programming ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using segmented r programming") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.