Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using segmented logic programming" » "coder using augmented logic programming" (Expand search), "coder using segment logic programming" (Expand search), "coder using selected logic programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented soil programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented social programming" (Expand search), "coder using cemented logical programming" (Expand search), "coders using segmented logic programming" (Expand search), "cover using segmented logic programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented logic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using segmented logic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using segmented logic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using segmented logic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using segmented logic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.