Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using segmented conic programming" » "coder using segmented logic programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented cone programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented convex programming" (Expand search), "coder using augmented conic programming" (Expand search), "coder using segment conic programming" (Expand search), "coder using selected conic programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented soil programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmented colon programming" (Expand search), "coder using segmental colonic programming" (Expand search), "coders using segmented conic programming" (Expand search), "cover using segmented conic programming" (Expand search), "code using segmented conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using segmented conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using segmented conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using segmented conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.