Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using segmentation algorithm in" » "coder using segmentation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using selection algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder lung segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder music segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder imaging segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using segmentation algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using segmentation algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using segmentation algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using segmentation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using segmentation algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using segmentation algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using segmentation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.