Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using scan algorithm in" » "coder using dbscan algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using an algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using cnn algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using scan algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using scan algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using scan algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using scan algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using scan algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using scan algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using scar algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using scale algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using scada algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using scan algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using scan algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using scan algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using scan algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.