Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using sampling algorithmic functions" » "coder using sampling logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using sampling logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using sampling algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder using sampling algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coder using sampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using upsampling algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using subsampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using saline algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using samples algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coders using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "cover using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "code using sampling algorithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using sampling algorithmic functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using sampling algorithmic functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using sampling algorithmic functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.