Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using recurrence algorithm in" » "coder using recurrent algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using recurrent algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using sequence algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using reference algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and recurrence algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using recurrence algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using recurrence algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using recurrence algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using recurrence algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using recurrence algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using recurrence algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using recurrence algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using recurrence algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using recurrence algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using recurrence algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.