Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using recent logical programming" » "coder using recent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder using recent goal programming" (Expand search), "coder using recent conic programming" (Expand search), "coder using recent biological programming" (Expand search), "coder using recent ecological programming" (Expand search), "coder using recent clinical programming" (Expand search), "coder using recurrent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder among recent logical programming" (Expand search), "coders using recent logical programming" (Expand search), "cover using recent logical programming" (Expand search), "code using recent logical programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using recent logical programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using recent logical programming ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using recent logical programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.