Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder using pytm python code" » "coders using pytm python code" (Expand search), "cover using pytm python code" (Expand search), "code using pytm python code" (Expand search), "coder using piton python code" (Expand search), "coder using path python code" (Expand search), "coder using pet python code" (Expand search), "coder using pdt python code" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using pytm python code") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using pytm python code\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using pytm python code ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using pytm python code") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.