Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using procedural implications programming" » "coder using procedural applications programming" (Expand search), "coder using procedural application programming" (Expand search), "coder using procedural application programing" (Expand search), "coder using procedural obligations programming" (Expand search), "coder using practical implications programming" (Expand search), "coder using structural implications programming" (Expand search), "coder easing procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "coder business procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "coder nursing procedures implications programming" (Expand search), "coders using procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "cover using procedural implications programming" (Expand search), "code using procedural implications programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using procedural implications programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using procedural implications programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using procedural implications programming ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using procedural implications programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.