Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using procedural implications program" » "coder using procedural obligations program" (Expand search), "coder using practical implications program" (Expand search), "coder using structural implications program" (Expand search), "coder using procedural application program" (Expand search), "coder using procedural implications from" (Expand search), "coder using procedural application programs" (Expand search), "coder easing procedural implications program" (Expand search), "coder business procedural implications program" (Expand search), "coder nursing procedures implications program" (Expand search), "coders using procedural implications program" (Expand search), "cover using procedural implications program" (Expand search), "code using procedural implications program" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using procedural implications program") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using procedural implications program\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using procedural implications program ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.