Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using nlms algorithm processing" » "coder using nlms algorithms process" (Expand search), "coder using nlms algorithmic processes" (Expand search), "coder using nlms algorithm modeling" (Expand search), "coder using lms algorithm processing" (Expand search), "coder using rls algorithm processing" (Expand search), "coder using s algorithm processing" (Expand search), "coders using nlms algorithm processing" (Expand search), "cover using nlms algorithm processing" (Expand search), "code using nlms algorithm processing" (Expand search), "coder using norms algorithm processing" (Expand search), "coder using nmr algorithm processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using nlms algorithm processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using nlms algorithm processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using nlms algorithm processing ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using nlms algorithm processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.