Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using negative object coding" » "coder using negative affect coding" (Expand search), "coder using negative effect coding" (Expand search), "coder using negative aspect coding" (Expand search), "coder using native object coding" (Expand search), "coder using relative object coding" (Expand search), "coder using generative object coding" (Expand search), "coder using negative object modeling" (Expand search), "coder using negative object counting" (Expand search), "coder using negative object naming" (Expand search), "coders using negative object coding" (Expand search), "cover using negative object coding" (Expand search), "code using negative object coding" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using negative object coding\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using negative object coding ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using negative object coding") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.