Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using motor function coding" » "coder using motor function crowding" (Expand search), "coder using motor function modeling" (Expand search), "coder using motor function working" (Expand search), "coders using motor function coding" (Expand search), "cover using motor function coding" (Expand search), "code using motor function coding" (Expand search), "coder during motor function coding" (Expand search), "coder using motion function coding" (Expand search), "coder aging motor function coding" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using motor function coding\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using motor function coding ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using motor function coding") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.