Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using mining logarithms functions" » "coder using mining logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using mining logarithm function" (Expand search), "coder using mining logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder using mining algorithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using mining algorithm functions" (Expand search), "coder using in logarithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using mininet logarithms functions" (Expand search), "coder during mining logarithms functions" (Expand search), "coder using mini logarithms functions" (Expand search), "coders using mining logarithms functions" (Expand search), "cover using mining logarithms functions" (Expand search), "code using mining logarithms functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using mining logarithms functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using mining logarithms functions ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using mining logarithms functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.