Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder using log algorithm in" » "coder using lbg algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using logic algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using logic algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using log algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using log algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using log algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using log algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using log algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using log algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using long algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using low algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using lhc algorithm in" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using log algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using log algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using log algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using log algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.