Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using grovers algorithm and" » "coder using grover's algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using grover algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder using gower's algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using gloves algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using drivers algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using groel algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using grovers algorithms and" (Expand search), "coder using grovers algorithm based" (Expand search), "coder using grovers algorithm _" (Expand search), "coders using grovers algorithm and" (Expand search), "cover using grovers algorithm and" (Expand search), "code using grovers algorithm and" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using grovers algorithm and") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using grovers algorithm and\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using grovers algorithm and ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using grovers algorithm and") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.