Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using functionally octave programming" » "coder using functionally active programming" (Expand search), "coder using functional octave programming" (Expand search), "coder using fractionally octave programming" (Expand search), "coder in functionally octave programming" (Expand search), "coder using functionally stage programming" (Expand search), "coder using functionally objective programming" (Expand search), "coder using functionally reactive programming" (Expand search), "coders using functionally octave programming" (Expand search), "cover using functionally octave programming" (Expand search), "code using functionally octave programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using functionally octave programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using functionally octave programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using functionally octave programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using functionally octave programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.