Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using frequency algorithm parallel" » "coder using sequence algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "coder using subsequence algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "coder using frequency algorithms parallel" (Expand search), "coder using frequency algorithmes parallele" (Expand search), "coder using frequency algorithmes paralleles" (Expand search), "coder single frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "coder feeding frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "coder grazing frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "coders using frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "cover using frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search), "code using frequency algorithm parallel" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using frequency algorithm parallel\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using frequency algorithm parallel ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using frequency algorithm parallel") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.