Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using floor function modeling" » "coder using floor function modelling" (Expand search), "coder using floor function models" (Expand search), "coder using floor function model" (Expand search), "coder using floor dysfunction modeling" (Expand search), "coder using motor function modeling" (Expand search), "coder using floor dysfunctions modeling" (Expand search), "coders using floor function modeling" (Expand search), "cover using floor function modeling" (Expand search), "code using floor function modeling" (Expand search), "coder using flower function modeling" (Expand search), "coder using flexor function modeling" (Expand search), "coder using flow function modeling" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using floor function modeling") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using floor function modeling\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using floor function modeling ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using floor function modeling") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.