Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using feeding simple example" » "coder using finding simple example" (Expand search), "coder using feeding site example" (Expand search), "coder using feeding style example" (Expand search), "coder using feeding simple sample" (Expand search), "coder during feeding simple example" (Expand search), "coder using freezing simple example" (Expand search), "coder going feeding simple example" (Expand search), "coders using feeding simple example" (Expand search), "cover using feeding simple example" (Expand search), "code using feeding simple example" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using feeding simple example\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using feeding simple example ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using feeding simple example") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.