Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using error function model" » "coder using motor function model" (Expand search), "coder using floor function model" (Expand search), "coder using barrier function model" (Expand search), "coder using error function models" (Expand search), "coder using error functional model" (Expand search), "coder using error functional models" (Expand search), "coders using error function model" (Expand search), "cover using error function model" (Expand search), "code using error function model" (Expand search), "coder nursing errors function model" (Expand search), "coder using ferrous function model" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using error function model") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using error function model\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using error function model ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using error function model") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.