Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using embedding algorithm in" » "coder using embedded algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using labelling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using labeling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using embedded algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder music embedding algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder point embedding algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using embedding algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using embedding algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using embedding algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using embedding algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using embedding algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using embedding algorithm in" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using embedding algorithm in") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using embedding algorithm in\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using embedding algorithm in ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using embedding algorithm in") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.