Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using embedded nonlinear programming" » "coder using embedded linear programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedding nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded curvilinear programming" (Expand search), "coder in embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "coders using embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "cover using embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "code using embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using embedded nonlinear programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using embedded nonlinear programming\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using embedded nonlinear programming ) OR ( api in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using embedded nonlinear programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.