Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using embedded linear programmin" » "coder using embedded linear programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded liver programmin" (Expand search), "coder using embedded linux programmin" (Expand search), "coder using embedded fiber programmin" (Expand search), "coder in embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "coders using embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "cover using embedded linear programmin" (Expand search), "code using embedded linear programmin" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using embedded linear programmin\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using embedded linear programmin ) OR ( api in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using embedded linear programmin") OR ("api in python python programming"))*.