Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using embedded coder programming" » "coder using embedded modern programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded cone programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded order programming" (Expand search), "coder in embedded coder programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded model programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded fiber programming" (Expand search), "coder using embedded otdr programming" (Expand search), "coders using embedded coder programming" (Expand search), "cover using embedded coder programming" (Expand search), "code using embedded coder programming" (Expand search)
"api in python python programming" » "api in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api in piton python programming" (Expand search), "api in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api _ python python programming" (Expand search), "api an python python programming" (Expand search), "fpi in python python programming" (Expand search), "gpi in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using embedded coder programming") OR ("api in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using embedded coder programming\") OR (\"api in python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using embedded coder programming ) OR ( api in python python programming ))*.