Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using effective algorithm in" » "coder using objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using objective algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using evolutive algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder using affective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using selective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using subjective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder using effective algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder using effective algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder using effective algorithm with" (Expand search), "coders using effective algorithm in" (Expand search), "cover using effective algorithm in" (Expand search), "code using effective algorithm in" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using effective algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using effective algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using effective algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using effective algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.