Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using discursive typed programming" » "coder using discursive based programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive mixed programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive cpld programming" (Expand search), "coder during discursive typed programming" (Expand search), "coder using dispersive typed programming" (Expand search), "coder musica discursive typed programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive type programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive topic programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive time programming" (Expand search), "coders using discursive typed programming" (Expand search), "cover using discursive typed programming" (Expand search), "code using discursive typed programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using discursive typed programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using discursive typed programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using discursive typed programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.