Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using discursive type programming" » "coder during discursive type programming" (Expand search), "coder using dispersive type programming" (Expand search), "coder musica discursive type programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive typed programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive the programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive time programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive topic programming" (Expand search), "coder using discursive appeal programming" (Expand search), "coders using discursive type programming" (Expand search), "cover using discursive type programming" (Expand search), "code using discursive type programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using discursive type programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using discursive type programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using discursive type programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.