Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using diffusive sampler programming" » "coder using diffusive computer programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffusive ladder programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffusive cancer programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffusive samplers programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffusive laminar programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffusion sampler programming" (Expand search), "coder using diffuse sampler programming" (Expand search), "coder using dispersive sampler programming" (Expand search), "coders using diffusive sampler programming" (Expand search), "cover using diffusive sampler programming" (Expand search), "code using diffusive sampler programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using diffusive sampler programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using diffusive sampler programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using diffusive sampler programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.