Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using depth in programming" » "coder using depth and programming" (Expand search), "coder using depth _ programming" (Expand search), "coder using depth c programming" (Expand search), "coders using depth in programming" (Expand search), "cover using depth in programming" (Expand search), "code using depth in programming" (Expand search), "coder sowing depth in programming" (Expand search), "coder using dental in programming" (Expand search), "coder using depth of programming" (Expand search)
"api pythons piton python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons in python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons with python programming" (Expand search), "api python piton python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using depth in programming\") OR (\"api pythons piton python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using depth in programming ) OR ( api pythons piton python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using depth in programming") OR ("api pythons piton python programming"))*.