Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder using coupled algorithm complexity" » "coder using coupled algorithms complexity" (Expand search), "coder using coupled algorithmic complexity" (Expand search), "coder using coupling algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder using complete algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coder using coupling algorithms complexity" (Expand search), "coder in coupled algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "coders using coupled algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "cover using coupled algorithm complexity" (Expand search), "code using coupled algorithm complexity" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using coupled algorithm complexity\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using coupled algorithm complexity ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using coupled algorithm complexity") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.