Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder using cooking loss method" » "coder reusing cooking loss method" (Expand search), "coder during cooking loss method" (Expand search), "coder using docking loss method" (Expand search), "coder using cooking oil method" (Expand search), "coder using cooking oils method" (Expand search), "coders using cooking loss method" (Expand search), "cover using cooking loss method" (Expand search), "code using cooking loss method" (Expand search), "coder using cooking class method" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder using cooking loss method") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder using cooking loss method\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder using cooking loss method ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder using cooking loss method") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.